Bacteria adapt and multiply much faster than rabbits, this is why we still have P.
Dood":2a6w1h65 said:Bacteria adapt and multiply much faster than rabbits, this is why we still have P.
LauraNJ":20l9xkpq said:Frecs":20l9xkpq said:I'm very skeptical and very concerned that it is being used as a "cure" rather than a preventative.
From what I have seen and read, everyone is using it as a preventative at this point. A few breeders tried it out on ones who had white snot that were quarantined to see what it would do. Some had initial good responses but then the snot reappeared or got worse and those were culled.
That is a pretty glaring issue.OneAcreFarm":ioamsdco said:My main hesitation is the fact that the vaccinated rabbits in the study STILL CAME DOWN WITH PASTEURELLOSIS when they were given a challenge dose of P.Multocida. To me, that says that it does NOT prevent anything.
Miss M":21c5ocdb said:That is a pretty glaring issue.OneAcreFarm":21c5ocdb said:My main hesitation is the fact that the vaccinated rabbits in the study STILL CAME DOWN WITH PASTEURELLOSIS when they were given a challenge dose of P.Multocida. To me, that says that it does NOT prevent anything.
Frecs":1j5qfqr5 said:I'm very skeptical and very concerned that it is being used as a "cure" rather than a preventative.
MamaSheepdog":1j5qfqr5 said:I have not yet read the studies, so forgive me if this was addressed.
I have the same concerns as those stated above.
Given the fact that antibiotic therapy does not effect a cure due to limited blood flow to the sinuses, would not the same apply to the antibodies in the circulatory system? If they can't reach the sinuses and the resident bacteria, wont the animal always be carrying a possibly infective load of Pasteurella, though the rabbit itself is asymptomatic?
TMTex":1j5qfqr5 said:Just an update as requested.
One of my lactating Cali does was sneezing, most likely due to heat stress. I vaccinated her on June 20 and gave her 0.5cc oxytetracyline per day subcutaneously for 7 days. There was never any discharge. She sneezes every now and then, but they're still dry sneezes. A knot is forming at the vaccine injection site. Massaging the knot daily doesn't seem to have any effect. Otherwise, she seems fine.
I vaccinated our indoor pet rabbit (mutt) and a newly acquired Flemish Giant today (Saturday, June 29).
[/quote]I have to ask (I don't know enough about immunology in general, let alone in rabbits), would P be able to sufficiently colonize in the sinuses to cause a problematic infection? If the vaccine empowers the immune system, and it passes from the sinuses to the general bloodstream, wouldn't it then be fought off - removing the concern of transference via parasites?
If the animal is truly asymptomatic, the P wouldn't become airborne via sneezing/coughing, so the only outlet would be other bodily fluids?
Not trying to be argumentative. I'm simply curious on how the disease is transmitted/how the vaccine prevents transference from colonized sinuses as you asked.
Madpiratebippy":3esfjhax said:I'm not a doctor, nor do I play on on TV,
dayna":xaj9u3nx said:Madpiratebippy":xaj9u3nx said:I'm not a doctor, nor do I play on on TV,
HA! You sound like me. I say that too.
I did choose to vaccinate all my rabbits. Before vaccinating we had snotty noses and some deaths. Since vaccinating (even vaccinating sick animals) all animals vaccinated recovered, no more snot illness.
So anyone can take that for what it's worth.
I think you need to read up a bit more of Pasturella multocidaIN MY NOT VERY HUMBLE OPINION, YOU ARE BEING INSANE IF YOU DO NOT VACCINATE AND YOU HAVE ANY OF THIS GOING ON IN YOUR HOUSE:
.
.
.
....The risks of this vaccine compared to the risks of Pasturella are just way, way, way in favor of the vaccine.
Source - http://www.hpa.org.uk/Topics/Infectious ... formation/Transmission
Dog and cat bites, scratches or licks are the most common cause of human infections with P. multocida. Pre-existing open wounds or scratches may also become infected with the organism. Infections have been associated with a range of other animals including rabbits and cows, however often the patient has had no animal contact. Animals do not have to be ill to pass the bacterium to humans, as they can carry the organism without showing symptoms.
Dood":3qp6cgr6 said:Unless your going to vaccinate ALL your animals and live in a bubble then its pretty pointless to vaccinate your rabbits to prevent the disease in humans.
Perhaps you should amend it to ...IN MY NOT VERY HUMBLE OPINION, YOU ARE BEING INSANE IF YOU DO NOT VACCINATE AND YOUIN MY NOT VERY HUMBLE OPINION, YOU ARE BEING INSANE IF YOU DO NOT VACCINATE AND YOU HAVE ANY OF THIS GOING ON IN YOUR HOUSE:
dayna":2vqve8pn said:I must admit, that my daughter is immuno compromised and that did/does factor into what we vaccinate or try to vaccinate for animal/human wise around here and how we clean/sanitize. When she was 11 she got salmonella. Most kids would have had diarrhea for a day or two. She got medflighted from Alaska to Washington in a small jet with 3 flight nurses keeping her stable and then she was in quarentine/CCU for a week at Childrens in Seattle.
So every thing I do food, livestock, cleaning, vaccinating, etc I keep her in my mind. Which I figure is what Madpiratebippy does too.
Dood":2vqve8pn said:Your statement wasPerhaps you should amend it to ...IN MY NOT VERY HUMBLE OPINION, YOU ARE BEING INSANE IF YOU DO NOT VACCINATE AND YOUIN MY NOT VERY HUMBLE OPINION, YOU ARE BEING INSANE IF YOU DO NOT VACCINATE AND YOU HAVE ANY OF THIS GOING ON IN YOUR HOUSE:HAVE ANY OF THIS GOING ON IN YOUR HOUSEARE IMMUNO COMPROMISED
Complications include abscesses, cellulitis and joint infections. The organism can also infect the respiratory tract and cause sinusitis and ear infections, and more severe symptoms including pneumonia or lung abscesses in those with underlying pulmonary disease, however this is rare. Other uncommon presentations of P. multocida infection include septicaemia (blood poisoning), eye infections, meningitis and gastrointestinal problems. Very rarely, the infection is fatal: 5 patients with severe infection have died since 1993, the last occurring in 2006
Madpiratebippy":1flasqae said:The pasturella vaccine has been used in food animals since the late 70's-early 80s and there has not been one case of any reactions in the people who've eaten the animals who were injected. So if the only thing you're worried about is your own death, statistically, the vaccine makes sense. If you don't want your animals to die and to have to go through any of the other crud, it's a slam dunk.
I'm more worried about getting sick myself and loosing my animals than dying, but the statistics are all the same. I'm not sure what else you'd like me to know about pasturella infections that would change my risk assessments? Even if I didn't have immune issues, my husband is allergic to the antibiotics that work (he's healthy as a horse), we would still vaccinate. Even if he wasn't allergic to antibiotics, I don't want my rabbits to die from something preventable, so vaccine is a go.
dayna":h54k4s61 said:I totally agree more testing needs to be done. I was actually surprised it was approved with so little testing. But with my small rabbitry it was worth it. If I had a lot more money invested it would not be worth it, and I would have stronger bio hazard type methods in place instead.