The vegan bit has always seemed a bit much to me (for many reasons)
tripped across this article though - and thought - yah - this, this makes sense ... for the planet and for ourselves ... I think I might be in love
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/int ... z1YAo0XuAU
Parsed heavily:
You wouldn't think being a vegetarian is a dangerous idea. Well, says ...Jonathan Safran Foer, ''There are ideas that can literally put you in physical danger, which this one can, There are ideas that are socially dangerous, which this one is. There are ideas that are dangerous because of their potential to change things in a dramatic way, which this one also is. So by most definitions, I would say that not eating animals is a dangerous idea.''
Modern industrial farming comes at the cost, Foer says, of animal welfare, the environment and our health. .
''With [the question of eating meat], even if you give it as generous and humble approach as you can, it's almost impossible not to avoid heated feelings. It speaks to a shared awareness that something really big is going on. Even if you think it's a fine thing to do.''
''One of the things I want to do ... is
move away from this harmful dichotomy that has been set up: you either care or you don't care at all. You're vegetarian or you are a carnivore. Most people do care about these issues and the reality is that most people are not going to become vegetarian.''
Foer's aim is to open a middle ground where people can make a difference.
''Do I think there is any chance in the world that half of Americans will be vegetarians in 10 years? I would say there is virtually no chance in the world of that. Do I think there is any chance that half of the meals eaten in America will be vegetarian in 10 years? I think there is a good chance of that.
''And that would have the same impact on the world - whether it's half the people or half the meals. It's just that we are not used to thinking about that second way because we've become so convinced that it's a question of identity or lifestyle as opposed to the end that we want.''
He would love to see more people thinking about the end, not the means.
''There is a wonderful food writer in America named Mark Bittman and he doesn't eat meat until 5pm. After five, he eats everything. Almost everybody's response is to chuckle at that because it makes us uncomfortable, somehow. It seems radically hypocritical.
''On the other hand, he is somebody who doesn't eat any animal products for two-thirds of his meals. I think it's amazing. If more people could think like that, we would solve the problem.''
''I've found that the more someone cares about food, the more they care about this. So chefs and farmers have actually been some of the biggest allies of the book.''
He was also surprised at the general consensus he found that ''the farming system we have isn't the farming system we want'', he says.
''I don't mean that everyone thinks we should become vegetarian, because that's clearly not true. What I mean is when [we factor in] … the environmental effect, the human health effect, the effect on animals, you just don't meet people who are OK with them. I have yet to find people who don't care.''
''They are aware of it [factory farming] being out there and aware of it being pretty bad but not aware that any time they eat in a restaurant or go shopping in the supermarket [they have no other choice].''
He says there is an alternative and it doesn't mean food will become prohibitively expensive, less available, less profitable or less safe.
''I think there is a future in small, animal-friendly farming - and it's not so small, by the way.
''It's how all farming was done only 70 years ago. It's one of the most impressive things about factory farming: how quickly it radicalised a system that is as old as human history. We'd been farming in one way, pretty much without huge changes, forever. And all of a sudden we are farming in this radically different way.
Foer puts some caveats on the prospect of small farms feeding the world.
''We have to eat much, much, much less, just because there isn't enough earth on Earth. And the other caveat is we pay the real cost - and people would eat a lot less.''
Is that such a bad thing? Given our losing battle with obesity in First World countries such as Australia, eating less seems like a positive. Foer says: ''The bad thing is the rich people would get to eat what they want, the poor people wouldn't. But that's already true.''
Read more:
http://www.smh.com.au/entertainment/int ... z1YJBGWA3P