michaels4gardens":20qmd2hj said:
My formal education was very limited, but I learned to love/ read books, -when homeschooling my kids, it was obvious to me , that they needed a much better basic education , then I could provide, so-- we went to the library a lot [and I found a math tutor, I could trade for labor with] we all learned a lot.
My kids are homeschooled too, but we don't follow a curriculum. We are what are called "Unschoolers" or "Life Learners", and the kids simply follow their interests and learn that way. They all love to read, and the internet makes research laughably simple.
michaels4gardens":20qmd2hj said:
I still wonder ,---is this literacy deficit, we now enjoy a product of the homes children are raised in, the "education system", chemical poisoning from frankenfoods, or just the much lower IQ modern people have.
Certainly their home life has a lot to do with it... I see so many people that talk to kids (especially infants and toddlers) using very basic language like they are incapable of understanding words of more than a syllable or two, and who don't let their kids learn new skills when they first show an interest- things like pouring a glass of juice (because they will inevitably spill it and cause a mess)- so they inadvertently thwart them.
But I think most of it is the education system. Most people are unaware of where our current school system comes from. During the Industrial Revolution, a group of American businessmen visited Austria. They were astonished by the placid, obedient population that was content to work in factories all day doing mindless, repetitive work... and wanted that same docile workforce for themselves.
The answer? Condition children from a young age that they must respect authority to the extent that they must ask permission to speak, use the restroom, or get a drink of water; that others know best what they should study (Today, class, we are going to learn about...), that they must respond to bells to mark out their days, that they must repeat a task over and over and over again whether they grasped the concept after the first few problems or not (look at the math sheets kids are forced to do, with hundreds of the same type of problem), and finally, send yet more of this "work" home so that they have even less time to interact with their community or to learn about things of interest to them personally.
There is no natural flow to learning in school- it is too broken up by "periods"- so often times once a child starts grasping a concept, the bell rings, and they have to switch gears to something totally unrelated.
Another big problem is the fact that kids are expected to learn to read (or do math, or whatever) at a certain age, and since they are all developmentally different, the kids that aren't "ready" come away with a lifelong aversion to that particular subject because they feel that they are "stupid" or no good at it. Add to that the fact that they are forced to study subjects that hold no personal interest, making learning a chore not a pleasure, and you can see why they would much rather watch TV or play video games in their spare time.
Yet another detrimental factor is segregating children by age so that they interact only with their "peer group". There isn't a whole lot that a bunch of six year olds can teach each other, but if they were exposed to kids of all ages? Or *gasp!* adults in their community?
The old "one room schoolhouse" was a far better learning environment for students, not only because of the social interaction, but because those that were capable could do more advanced work.
But the biggest factor of all, I think, is that so much of what is taught in school has no practical application for the student. If they have no need of it in daily life, they may retain it until test day, but then they promptly forget it.
Remember the Three Rs? Reading, 'riting, and 'rithmetic? Those basic skills- the ability to read, write, and do basic math- is all that really needs to be taught in schools. Once those skills are mastered, I think the student should be free to pursue their own fields of interest. Those that need higher math to attain their goals will learn (and retain!) those skills.
The system that we have in place today fosters mediocrity; kids learn a little bit about a lot of things, but have no in depth knowledge of anything. If each individual were allowed to study what they were interested in we would see an explosion of innovative ideas, scientific breakthroughs, and a blossoming of music and the arts.
ilovehome":20qmd2hj said:
There are some intelligent people who simply can not spell because of dyslexia, or other brain disorders.
...and there are plenty of people with no "disorders" that can't spell... or do calculus... or fix a broken appliance. Just because someone isn't adept in a certain field doesn't make them stupid... we each have our own strengths and weaknesses.