Frecs
Well-known member
Kyle@theHeathertoft":2n55b2n9 said:you can bet even long after I bred the other breed off their pedigrees, I'd mention possible recessives to future buyers. I don't want any surprises for them.
Seems to me from what has been said, recessives will always be there any any domestic rabbit no matter how "purebred" it is. It's just a matter of weeding out the undesirable recessives as much as possible so they don't become a major problem.
This has been a very informative discussion! Thanks to everyone who contributed!<br /><br />__________ Thu Jul 18, 2013 1:15 pm __________<br /><br />
LauraNJ":2n55b2n9 said:All the breeds were developed by crossbreeding.
Technically, we do not know what breeds went into the silver foxes. For all any of us know, he used harlis and angoras and some breeders are just now seeing it after inbreeding. Those recessives are coming out.
I don't really see what the big deal is since it could have been carried for a very long time. I think some people just make a huge deal out of something very simple really to deal with.
Questions:
1. I've been wondering this since the big brewhahaha...as long as you don't cross a SF-harle gene carrier to another SF-harle gene carrier, the harle gene doesn't do anything. Right? So, what's the biggie? If you get harle's, you know not to breed those two together again. Ditto for wool.
2. Other than my solution (#1) what other ways would one "deal with" the discovery of "undesirable" genes? Well, obviously culling but, what else?