REW rules out torts in this case?

Rabbit Talk  Forum

Help Support Rabbit Talk Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

TF3

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2015
Messages
890
Reaction score
3
Location
South River, Ontario
I'm still figuring out these two litters of meat kits...

Moms are harle, dad is broken red and we got a range: red (well, fawn), harle, broken red and tri
Clover: A_ B_ C_ D_ eje enen
Holly: A_ B_ C_ D_ eje enen
Prince Harry: A_ B_ C_ D_ ee ENen

There are a couple from Holly that look torted, but it is now confirmed there are two REW in her litter, so that being the case, both she and the sire would have to be Cc, right?
So the apparent torts are smutty fawns I assume?
 
A tort is a
self = aa
full colour = C_
non-extension = ee

So getting REW has no bearing on whether torts are in the litter

This does mean that chinchilla (cchd_) sable (cchl_) and himilayan (ch_ ) are not possible from this pair

PS Fawn is agouti, full colour, non extension = A_ C_ ee
 
Ah!
Thank you!
I keep thinking tort is in the C.
Need to remind myself the colour doesn't extend everywhere ee

So we'll see!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top