Comet007":30khezy6 said:
I'm going to respectfully disagree with you respectfully disagreeing with me…
And that is what I love about rabbittalk, that we can have conversations without hostility, and that I have the chance to hear and learn from other perspectives, even if we may not ultimately agree.
Comet007":30khezy6 said:
You sound like you think I haven't done my research in regard to the food we eat.
I am sorry you got that impression, no insult intended. You came across to me as knowing your stuff; that is why I responded to you. I have a different perspective based on my experiences, that is all. I was interested in exploring your perspective.
Comet007":30khezy6 said:
But - for someone who needs for health reasons to avoid those hormones, pesticides, antibiotics and who knows what else, it's just not the same.
TOTALLY understand this, more than I would ever want to. The point I was trying to make--you're right, if a food is raised with 100% organic standards and ethical practices it isn't the same as one that is "mostly" raised that way, but it is difficult to find that out without a lot of leg- and brain-work. How a product is marketed or sold to you can imply something is much purer or healthier than it is, even with the USDA Organic label. We both agree on that, and if I didn't pick that up from your earlier posts, sorry--middle age may be playing havoc on me.
Comet007":30khezy6 said:
Anyone who follows SOME or MOST organic practices who then tries to tag on the "grown/raised following organic practices" gets slapped down pretty hard by others in the local industry and their customers when they get found out.
I agree with that; claiming you are following practices or trying to imply something that is not true is utterly unethical, and there should be consequences. I do not like being lied to, as a consumer. (For that matter I don't like being lied to as a non-consumer either, but that's besides the point.) I am glad to hear that in your area it is being self-policed by other growers so there is little motivation to try to do that. Wish it were that way everywhere.
Comet007":30khezy6 said:
I truly don't mind that we are going off topic here. I understand the frustration that is met by someone who has a small operation and is seemingly being held back by the government and corporations. I think I understand what you're saying - that many people believe that "USDA certified" seal is the absolute guarantee that you are only getting the best, healthiest foods available. Unfortunately, we as the consumer don't get to stop there if we really want to watch our foods.
Yes--you nailed exactly what I was trying to say. That was the point I was trying to get across as well when I said I'd rather buy from the 88 year old non-organic farmer, because I can see what he's doing, and I can ask how he's growing it, and he'll tell me. He'll be up-front in saying what has been grown with just the manure from his animals vs. the tomatoes he sprayed, and he'll be upfront with what he put on his crops (sometimes to the point of pulling a container out of his truck, so I can see it,if he has it on him.) We can chat, and I can find out what I need to know and how it'll affect me based on that vs. someone who will tell me "all our products are USDA organic" and not be very upfront on what that means in their operation. Their feed may be clean, but if their animals are raised in crowded/stressful situations, or produce is being grown organically but out of season, it's still not good food for me to eat, especially at a premium price.
My issue isn't with food being organic or certified, but it is with how food is produced and marketed to us so we can make decisions. From your comments, I think we agree on that point.
Comet007":30khezy6 said:
There's another thing not even mentioned - and that's the ETHICS of certain foods!
You are right. It is a huge issue that has many layers to it. Could be a worthy discussion in another post that people might enjoy discussing. I would look forward to reading comments, with a homebrew in hand!