catfishingpokey
Member
My son entered his first "major" stock show junior rabbit show in San Angelo, Texas today. We took a Californian senior buck that we thought was pretty mediocre and a Californian senior doe we thought was pretty nice. Our buck placed 8th (out of 19), but our doe was pulled in the first round out of 25. The ARBA judge's explanation on why he eliminated her was that she was long in the shoulder and was "rough." We are trying to learn from this experience so we know which rabbit to take next time. I always thought that rough meant not enough meat so that you can feel spine and bones. Honestly, I would have thought that he was the much rougher rabbit of the two because when you run your hand down him you can find his bones, where with her you can't. Can anyone provide us with some insight into what the judge meant?
She was one of the biggest girls in the class (she's about 10 1/2 pounds) and I did notice that those were the rabbits he eliminated first, in her class anyway, I didn't notice in other classes. He cut the smallest and biggest rabbits. Is that always true? I realize that ARBA judges are completely different from the ag teachers that judge at county, but she was Grand Champion Doe here locally. The buck placed dead last in his class at the local show. We were a little surprised when they flip flopped in San Angelo.
Thanks,
Pokey
She was one of the biggest girls in the class (she's about 10 1/2 pounds) and I did notice that those were the rabbits he eliminated first, in her class anyway, I didn't notice in other classes. He cut the smallest and biggest rabbits. Is that always true? I realize that ARBA judges are completely different from the ag teachers that judge at county, but she was Grand Champion Doe here locally. The buck placed dead last in his class at the local show. We were a little surprised when they flip flopped in San Angelo.
Thanks,
Pokey