'Rare Earless Bunny'? Think we've all had one of those when either the mother 'overcleaned' or was deranged. Why was it in a spot where the cameraman could step on it? I also don't grasp why it would be a main attraction just because it was earless, as that was most likely from damage at birth or a birth defect. Unfortunate that the klutz stepped on it, but since it was a prey animal it could have died any number of ways. Could have ended up dying from complications arising from its birth defect, it looked really young, or succumbed to normal young rabbit maladies. I've seen some really funky birth defects in rabbits, earlessness is rather mild and not rare and not a big deal. Show me a two faced kit and I'll get excited. Geuss I'm a tad harsh, just seems like a poor choice for a main attraction for a zoo.