MamaSheepdog
Well-known member
When using the Rabbit Wringer or similar device, is there any bleeding from the nose or mouth?
MewsicLovr":3u7bynu3 said:Have an odd question on this, and my google-fu is failing me. What is it about cervical dislocation specifically that kills the rabbit? Like, what is it about breaking the neck that kills? It seems like the cord would still be attached to the brain and therefore they would still be "alive" in theory. I'm not questioning that it does in fact kill, I'm just wondering what the scientific reason is.
Just something I was wondering about today.
MamaSheepdog":1yr0yx4g said:Thanks for the input, everyone.
For human meat consumption I still prefer to bonk them on the forehead and swiftly cut their necks because there is no bruising to the neck area.
However, I have a cull buyer that sells to zoos and the reptile hobbyist market, so need to be able to present an intact, blood free carcass. Cervical dislocation seems to be a good way to go.
He has other breeders who use Co2 chambers to dispatch, but I have read conflicting views on those in regard to rabbits.
MamaSheepdog":jrljzmqq said:Thanks for the input, everyone.
For human meat consumption I still prefer to bonk them on the forehead and swiftly cut their necks because there is no bruising to the neck area.
However, I have a cull buyer that sells to zoos and the reptile hobbyist market, so need to be able to present an intact, blood free carcass. Cervical dislocation seems to be a good way to go.
He has other breeders who use Co2 chambers to dispatch, but I have read conflicting views on those in regard to rabbits.
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide euthanasia has been recommended (Lumb and Jones, 1973), but Green (1979), Ewbank (1983) and Green (1987) have recommended against using it. This is because in animals larger than guinea pigs there seems to be a delay in the loss of consciousness, together with distress (manifested by restlessness, deep respiration, salivation, pawing at the nose) before they collapse. This distress is believed to result from breathlessness and irritation by carbonic acid production on the nasal mucosa (Ewbank, 1983). However Von Cranach et al., (1991) have recommended the use of 100% carbon dioxide. The method may be acceptable for use on baby rabbits up to three weeks of age, but they have a very high tolerance to anoxia and will recover after 30 minutes of anoxia (Glass et al., 1944).
In the opinion of the writing group the use of carbon dioxide in rabbits is not acceptable.
Dood":psgp3d4u said:Carbon dioxide is no longer considered an acceptable method of euthanasia of many animals , including rabbits
From - https://www.adelaide.edu.au/ANZCCART/pu ... anasia.pdf
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide euthanasia has been recommended (Lumb and Jones, 1973), but Green (1979), Ewbank (1983) and Green (1987) have recommended against using it. This is because in animals larger than guinea pigs there seems to be a delay in the loss of consciousness, together with distress (manifested by restlessness, deep respiration, salivation, pawing at the nose) before they collapse. This distress is believed to result from breathlessness and irritation by carbonic acid production on the nasal mucosa (Ewbank, 1983). However Von Cranach et al., (1991) have recommended the use of 100% carbon dioxide. The method may be acceptable for use on baby rabbits up to three weeks of age, but they have a very high tolerance to anoxia and will recover after 30 minutes of anoxia (Glass et al., 1944).
In the opinion of the writing group the use of carbon dioxide in rabbits is not acceptable.
Enter your email address to join: